Saturday, October 25, 2008

WARNING! Residents of Centerville!

This is actually the title of a flier Jeff Paar is dropping on doors around town. The flier goes on to state:
"Do not believe the information going around the city by a supposed watch dog group or some of the other candidates. There is a lot of half-truths and misinformation being provided. I have delivered action with results!"
First, we would like to question what exactly are the half-truths and misinformation Mr. Paar is constantly referring to? He does not point out any specific example, not one.
As far as the other candidates he fails to mention any names, which is the height of irresponsibility and fear mongering!
Paar further states that he has delivered action with results.
That is certainly true, is it not? When will we know what our property tax increase is? What about the special assessments?
Paar also states in red lettering that "Some candidates are saying they are running for you the residents of Centerville actually want Centerville annexed by Lino Lakes."
Again, he fails to mention which candidates he is referring to, and continues with the baseless attacks. Who is really providing half-truths and misinformation?
The final and most offensive statement is:
"Don't give your vote to candidates who misrepresent facts. Visit www.centervillemn.com to get accurate information."
This is laughable considering the City has not updated the Council meeting minutes online since 8/27/2008! Therefore; any accurate information on the past two months is unavailable!
Is Jeff Paar using a CITY WEBSITE as his own personal campaign tool? It would certainly appear that his campaign has been assisted by the information currently posted (and not posted) on OUR City website.
Is Centerville better off now than it was six years ago? That is how long this man has been in office. As for being a "supposed" watch-dog group? We cite each statement with a factual source which is more than Jeff Paar's flier does.
Be wary of anyone on the attack without the facts to back their attack. It goes to the heart of their credibility. It's time to ask Jeff Paar to explain...

Friday, October 24, 2008

Propaganda Machine?

The City officials have claimed to be transparent but have failed to update the City council minutes since August. They have however been diligent in attacking the people behind the State Audit petition and are doing so on the home page!
Is the City website really for the people or just another tool for free (and possibly illegal) campaigning?! When will the Council minutes be updated? We suspect it will be conveniently sometime after the election... As will be your tax increase letter, when it is too late.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Petition Against The Petition?

Whoa! The current council actually threw that out there on the October 22 meeting. The attorney stated that "The City is not as of yet sponsoring a counter petition" during the session.
To clarify, one of the State Audit Petition walkers had heard on the street that Mayor Mary Capra was spouting off about some residents wanting their names removed after they had initially signed. Instead of contacting us or returning our emails to find a solution, she decided to make political hay out of it. She even contacted the local newspapers and attempted to put her own spin on the story. Fortunately, the Pioneer Press reported both sides.
Link Here

No one associated with this group has been contacted regarding this issue and if they had, the names would have definitely been removed! The petition for the State Audit is a legal process and nobody associated with this group would jeopardize its legitimacy by refusing to remove a few names. There was contact information left with the petition signers that would have made it quite easy to contact this blog. In fact, many residents have had no problem finding us on their own. The support for this blog and the petition have been overwhelming.

The fact that the City Attorney is again involved (billing by the hour) and that Council formally put this issue on the agenda last night is curious. What are they afraid of?
The voices of the people will be finally heard in Centerville. Unfortunately, they have to go to the County and State level to make it happen.

Read the comments section to view some of the emails we have received.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Is This What Centerville Has In Store?

One developer in Circle Pines has requested rezoning on this commercial property five years after development.
Link Here
More to come about our neighbors in Circle Pines, Lino Lakes and Hugo soon...

Uppal Enterprises
33 Village Parkway
Circle Pines, MN 55014
(763) 795-8855

Selective Ordinance Enforcement Part Four

The City Ordinance 93.o3 (Streets and Sidewalks) regarding Mail Boxes is quite clear. They are to be in clusters of four to six. Why would Centerville allow single and/or double mailboxes to remain (excluding those in existence prior to amending) when there have been multiple complaints?



Hanzal Resigns From Planning Commission
The Citizen 10/18/2006
Hanzal's one sentence resignation letter, addressed to the "City of Centerville" and forwarded to the City Council for its October 11 meeting, reads as follows:
"It is with deepest regrets that I must resign from the Planning and Zoning Commission effective immediately following the October 3 meeting due to family obligations.
Link Story Here


Hanzal Subdivision Approved
The Citizen, 3/21/2007
At its March 14 meeting, the Centerville City Council unanimously passed four motions that will allow the Hanzal Subdivision development to go forward. The motions were based on recent recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Commission after several lengthy and heated public hearings.
The first and second motions respectively amended the city's comprehensive plan and changed the zoning of the entire 6.36 acre Hanzal Subdivision-located at 7381 Old Mill Road-to Single Family Residential (R-2) Portions of the property were zoned Public/Semi-Private (P-1) and Single Family Residential-Estate (R-5)
The third motion approved the preliminary plat for the development.
The fourth motion approved a variance to permit a 25-foot front yard setback on one parcel of the property, 10 feet less than the normal 35 feet required in this zoning district.
A handful of residents were present at the meeting, some wishing to present additional testimony. However, since public hearings on the issue have already bee closed,
City Administrator Dallas Larson told the public that "legal counsel has advised the city not to accept any additional comments this evening."
Link Story Here


When the City chooses to selectively enforce ordinances and approve variance changes without allowing public testimony (under advice of legal counsel, which the public pays for) it breeds mistrust and anger. Does this situation looks suspicious?

Sunday, October 19, 2008

A Little Public Works Building History


Centerville Gets New Public Works Site
*As noted by one resident, there is visible damage to the original public works building that was never addressed.

Staff Writer: Debra Neutkens,
Quad Press

Published: Tuesday, July 17, 2007


CENTERVILLE - City snowplows and trucks will all be stored inside at a new public works facility approved by the City Council July 11.
Members authorized purchase of land and a building at 2085 Cedar St. for $1.4 million, a deal that will close this November.
In the meantime, current owner Dennis Shudy will be making improvements to the 2-year-old facility, according to the city's needs. A $288,000 escrow fund was created to help Shudy pay for improvements as they're completed.


Centerville resident Tom Wilharber asked the council why the current public works facility couldn't be renovated, adding he was approached by other citizens about the purchase who questioned how saleable the property was with a water tower.
Mayor Mary Capra said the city has already been approached by a potential buyer for the current property and told Wilharber the steel structure on the site was too expensive to renovate. The city did consider building behind City Hall, she added, but the county road project is taking that land for ponding.

The current public works property is valued at about $400,000, the sale of which will go towards purchase of the Cedar Street site. The city has another $400,000 set aside for a new facility and the balance, about $600,000, will be borrowed from the sewer and water fund - essentially an internal loan, which will be paid back with interest.

When Wilharber asked how much debt Centerville currently carries, City Administrator Dallas Larson said about $4 million.

Wow! How did we jump from a $4 million debt to the current $8 million debt in one year? Also, if the City had already been approached by a potential buyer, why has the original public works building not sold? What was the mindset behind spending all that money while saving nothing for road maintenance? Our current council refuses to look back at previously made decisions yet is determined to move forward, full steam ahead with the revitalization project. History is a Great Teacher. Those that fail to learn from it are doomed to repeat it.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Candidate Forum

The Candidate Forum held at Eagle Brook Offices on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 is available (channel 16) by contacting Comcast Cable @ 651-222-3333 and requesting Universal Cable. There is no additional charge for this service but there may be an installation fee.
Schedule link here

This channel also airs the City Council meetings live at 6:30 pm on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is this Wednesday, the 22nd. It might not be a bad idea to keep an eye on them and you may do so from home.

Selective Ordinance Enforcement Part Three

From: JUDY TOM LEE
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:44 AM

Subject: RE: City Right of Way/Easement
Hi XXXX,
I spoke with Paul Palzer (the Building OFFICIAL) last night regarding your fence and tree. He confirmed that in his opinion, while a "technical" violation of the ordinace, the landscaping done on your property creates no problems for the city regarding snow plowing, nor does it create a line of sight issue when driving. Council considers his opinion when enforcing the ordinance. Though you MAY receive a letter to inform you of the ordinance and that if the city NEEDED to remove your landscaping for some reason, you would be required to do so without compensation. No action is required by you at this time all. It is likely you may not even be sent a letter, as you are already aware of this.
Talk to you later, Tom

As of today, the resident has not received a letter regarding the ordinance violation the City clearly states he/she is in.
What is the point of having ordinaces if they are not enforced equally? The City deals with violations on a complaint basis (call Mary Capra and ask) which leaves the door wide open for feuding neighbors and busy bodies. To those that might not know, Tom Lee is a sitting council member and condones this procedure.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Boooooooo!

Well everyone, stay tuned for more selective enforcement coming to your neighborhood. Halloween is here and the "tombstones" are back on Mill Road.



Centerville City Hall likes to refer to them as "signs" but we believe they are more like Halloween decorations - considering they are only on the lawn during the month of Halloween. Of course, if these are considered "signs" the city can tell you how many you can have on your lawn, but decorations are another thing... I wonder which media outlets will enjoy the coverage this year?

Unfortunately this has been an issue for years. If someone complains, your decorations conveniently become signs which coincidentally is an ordinance violation. Headless bloody corpses are far more tasteful, right? Does government have the right to legislate taste?

Racy Tombstones Replaced by Others
Eyewitness News
10/28/2005
Halloween tombstones offend neighbors (Oct. 25) Although a Centerville woman has agreed to remove several suggestive Halloween tombstones, the controversy is far from over. The tombstones each have names that double as puns, such as I.P. Freely and Ben Dover. Some of the names, however, are offensive to Heather Pranke’s neighbors and some passers by. Pranke agreed to remove three of the most offensive tombstones, but those are being replaced by six more.
As Pranke was installing the additional signs, a driver yelled out “They’re disgusting!” Robert Nelson, her neighbor two doors down, thinks the humor is not appropriate for such a public display. “Some things are better for a bar than a front yard,” said Nelson. “There were some that rhyme with duck.” Pranke hopes her neighbors are less offended with the new signs, which include such names as ‘Mia Butreaks’ and ‘Ilene Dover.’ “I just want everyone to enjoy my sense of humor as much as I do,” says Pranke.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Another Citizen Speaks Out About Misinformation

I cannot tell you how betrayed I felt when the City Council did not listen to us. The insult was added to injury when I saw the ridiculous expenses added to County RD 14 in the downtown area! All I can think of is that we have to pay for the colorized concrete and fancy lights because someone has buyers remorse for moving into Centerville. The audit issue concerns me because the signers can be billed for the auditing, if I understand it correctly. That makes sense: it would keep people from making false claims. On the other hand, it is precisely because of the cost of living in Centerville that the audit is being requested.

As a single person I am sick about the assessments I am facing. Retirement is a very distant possibility at this point but there is no way around it! It's far too late to escape by selling, even if anything was selling. Since the Council feels free to increase our liability, just to satisfy their vanity, there could be no end in sight! It is obvious that they wish they had bought their homes in a classier community.

Disinformation can really be hard to overcome. Certainly, there are folks who would want to frighten people to prevent an audit.

Unfortunately, some residents believe that they will have to personally pay for the State Audit if they sign. This is incorrect. The City will be billed and how they choose to pay the fee is up to the City officials. Currently, the City pays $30,000 for an audit that is not transparent. The State will complete a FULL audit and charge on an hourly rate. The State Auditors office is on record that the expense can be anywhere from $1,800 to $30,000.

Quarterly City Newsletter 10/15/2008

You might have noticed a small but significant change to the Centerville Newsletter.
It has been titled just that, The Centerville Newsletter for years.
The new title is... Drum-roll, please!
Centerville's Resident Communicator - Striving to Keep Residents Informed

Could this change be due to City Hall finally listening to the citizens and not an attempt to save face during an election year? Let's hope! Either way, the residents of this city and the supporters of the blog are forcing change!
If the City is really concerned with keeping residents informed, it might want to update the council minutes. As of today, the last published minutes (if you can find them) are from August 27, 2008. They are almost TWO MONTHS behind! This does not jive with the transparent government they always proclaim to be!

Thank you everyone for all your support and hard work! Let's keep it up!

Monday, October 13, 2008

Selective Ordinance Enforcement Part Two

Complaint based ordinance enforcement seems to be A-OK with the Mayor and current council. When all citizens are not treated equally, the door for retaliation and corruption is left wide open.

From: "Dan & Mary Capra" netfalcon@comcast.net
To: XXXX
Cc: dlarson@centervillemn.com; tbender@centervillemn.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:16 PM
Subject: Response to concerns

With regard to the retaliating against a citizen, the issue of the right-of-way concerns had been raised by our public works department five years ago. Last fall one citizen made a right-of-way ordinance violation complaint against their neighbor, which in turn spurred that neighbor to create a list of 80+ right-of-way violation complaints. The city enforces ordinances upon complaint and therefore had to review all 80+ complaints for merit. The council delegated that responsibility to the public works director and city attorney who reviewed the list and what was considered a hazard, thus the six addresses, of which the XXXX address was one. Below is a list of the addresses that did receive letters from the City regarding the right-of-way, at this point the City is not considering sending out any additional letters. The council was not involved in the process and was only informed six letters had been sent out.
XXXX Dupre Road
XXXX Peltier Lake Drive
XXXX Mill Road
XXXX Beaver Pond Way
XXXX Hunters Trail
XXXX Progress Road

Respectfully,
Mary Capra

Sent by one of our brilliant citizens:
Historically, selective enforcement is recognized as a sign of tyranny, and an abuse of power, because it violates Rule of Law, allowing men to apply justice only when they choose. Aside from this being inherently unjust, it almost inevitably must lead to favoritism and extortion, with those empowered to choose being able to help their friends, take bribes, and threaten those from whom they desire favors.

*Wikipedia

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Selective Ordinance Enforcement in Centerville

Stay tuned as we are gathering the facts to blow the lid off City Hall!
Why don't our City officials like the term selective ordinance enforcement? We will expose it!

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Tricks Of The Trade And Your Tax Rate

Many units of government employ various “methods” to hide tax increases and large spending increases. Awareness of these methods can help you ask the right questions to determine if your local government is guilty.

It’s Not Our Fault
Many local units of government simply blame someone else for the property tax increases they approve. They cite a list of mandates, lost aid, cost increases and other situations that they claim are out of their control.
Counter Argument: Local units of government are independently elected and locally accountable. They have been given the power to tax and spend. They are ultimately responsible for their taxing and spending decisions.

The “No Increase in the Tax Rate” Argument.
The tax rate is the percentage of property value that is taxed. Some governments take advantage of rising property values by keeping the tax rate flat but drawing more tax dollars from the property due to an increased assessed value. They then claim a victory on behalf of the taxpayer by proclaiming that tax rates weren’t raised.
Counter Argument: Ask elected officials what the tax levy rate would have been to keep spending flat. Ask why that lower rate wasn’t adopted.

Debt Service “Bait and Switch”.
In this scenario, a local unit of government issues bonds to pay for a particular project. Taxes are sometimes raised to cover the cost of paying off the debt. Much like a home mortgage, the debt is paid off over time. However, once the debt is paid, the local government diverts the debt payments into other accounts instead of eliminating the tax increase that was used to pay off the debt.
Counter Argument: Ask your elected officials what debt is outstanding or recently retired. Ask these officials to explain the debt service plan. If debt has been recently paid off, ask how that debt was financed.

Does this sound familiar? For more information link HERE
From The Anoka County Watchdog.
8/8/2008
"Over the past three years, the Watchdog has been proud to inspire other blogs and web sites dedicated to fiscal accountability and good government. We’re happy to give props to other web sites and blogs out there in Anoka County that are working hard to protect taxpayers. If you know of one, send it our way.
In the meantime, check out these folks in Centerville."
http://centervillemn.blogspot.com/

Thursday, October 2, 2008

A Citizen's Battle with the City - Oh, and by the way... Welcome to Centerville!

We moved to Centerville in 2004. Since moving here we have had to deal with a variety of issues that have caused us great inconvenience and aggravation: City water connection, The redevelopment plan, and Zoning.

When we purchased out home we called the city to ask about being hooked up to the city water system because we had a concern over the existing well. At that time we were told that all water concerns would be taken up by the city council when the road construction issue on County Road 14 was settled. We were repeatedly told that this matter would wait for the road construction and that we could get on city water when the road in front of our house was dug up sometime in 2008.

This spring we lost almost all water pressure. Our situation was grave. We called again and demanded that something be done because the lack of water had become a quality of life issue and a potential health hazard. We then found out that we could not drill a new well and also found out that our being hooked up to city water actually had nothing what so ever to do with the road construction in the front of our home and that water would come in through the back.

When we discovered that we could not dig a well but that we could get a city water hook-up we requested to proceed with the hook-up. It took the city of Centerville 6 months to begin the process.

We have been given all kinds of erroneous information and spent hours on the phone trying to find out about the bidding process, how we could be hooked up to a hydrant if need be, what the assessment would be, who would be responsible for acquiring and paying for a check valve, etc. etc. When a contractor was finally hired they gave us a date and were ready to start work immediately. The day that the contractors were to begin it was discovered that no one from the city had acquired the appropriate permits from the health department. This meant another 3-week delay. Not only was this inconvenient for us, it also cost the contractors lost time and money.

When the contractor began work on the project it was discovered at the end of the day that the wrong fittings had been used. The inspector sent by the city did not catch the problem when he made his inspection. The job had to be re-done leading to another delay. After all of this we had to wait for a chloroform test and a hydrostat test to be run.


In the end, the city council did agree and maintained our residential zoning. However, it should have been clear from looking at a map that there would never be a commercial interest in our property. We should not have had to speak at a council meeting in order to express this concern. A few months later, we were again informed that we were going to be re-zoned to mixed use rather than residential. If the city deemed this inappropriate once and nothing has changed, why are they now including our property in the second phase of the redevelopment project?

When we bought our property we were zoned as a residential property. If this proposed change is implemented we feel that our hands will be tied. If we are rezoned to mixed used any potential new owners will be faced with being non-conforming and will not be allowed to make any changes to the home. No developer will be interested in buying our property unless all of our neighbors also agree to sell. We feel that we are being unjustly placed in an unfair and unreasonable situation.


Conclusion
We would like to see the city prove that the market can substantiate the current plan before taking on an even bigger proposal. If it can be proved that the City Of Centerville can support all of the commercial and residential growth and development of the existing Comprehensive Plan over the next five or ten years, we think it would then be reasonable to consider further action. But, given the current declining economy and markets, we do believe that a fiscally conservative approach to development is warranted over the next few years.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Decision Delayed On Project Monitoring Request

The Citizen
10/01/2008
Centerville City Council members have delayed their decision on a request by the city engineer for a more that 50 percent increase to his bill to oversee work on CSAH 14.
Engineer Mark Statz explained at the city's September 24 meeting that his company's initial cost estimate of $55,428 to oversee Anoka County's work on CSAH 14 through Centerville had fallen short by some way as the 20 weeks of work budgeted in the 2007 and 2008 was insufficient to see the project through completion. "The reality of the situation is that the time has proved to be significantly less than what we really needed so we are asking at this point to increase our bill on this project by $35,000 to continue our efforts through to the end of the project," said Statz.

“We also thought at the time [of the initial bill] that Paul [Palzer, city public works director] and his staff would be able to spend a lot of time on the job; however, due to the resignation earlier this year and also there has been a hail storm … we have had to fill in the gaps there where we had planned to count on city staff to fill in and keep the costs down.” City council members expressed disappointment that they had only received news of the request the night of the meeting. “That’s a huge increase in the budget; that’s nearly 100 percent of the initial estimate,” said Council Member Tom Lee. Statz added that engineering staff had been spending on average 20 hours a week observing and reviewing the work of the Anoka County contractor on CSAH 14. “Our staff was so short this summer it was not able to do it,” added City Administrator Dallas Larson. “There were things that went wrong right away and we did need to have eyes and ears on the project, so there was some justification for having the time on the project.” City council members tabled the decision until their next meeting.
If approved, the oversight will cost the Citizens of Centerville a total of $90,428. Is this how Centerville should be spending our tax dollars in today's economy?

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

A Road Maintenance Pacifier?

City Minutes Work Session 8/13/2008
Finance Director John Meyer reviewed the draft budget for 2009 and commented on areas that Council members had suggested for change. Material he prepared also identified the impact to the levy if additional money were included for street maintenance at levels of $50,000, $100,000 and $150,000 per year. The Council consensus was that some amount perhaps around $25,000 could be included in the 2009 budget to begin setting aside additional money for streets. Mark Statz suggested doing a cost estimate for seal coating all streets once every five years and doing mill and overlay at 15 to 20 years. The Council would like to see the report showing the cost of such a maintenance program.

The Quad Press 8/19/2008
Mark Statz noted that the city would need to save more than $300,000 per year to keep pace with the road maintenance over the next 30 years without imposing assessments.
This statement was not in the approved work session minutes and is not required to be there by law. The reporter caught it though...
What is going on behind the walls of City Hall? When our own City Engineer states we should be saving $300,000 annually to avoid future assessments, why did they only budget $25,000? The future assessments will keep coming unless something is done to address the basic need of road maintenance! Is the pathetic amount of $25,000 a pacifier because it's election year?

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

The Numbers Are Not Adding Up

During the 9/24/2008 meeting, Council addressed trail grant money. Included in the Handout
The trail needs were identified during the 1997 City's comprehensive planning process. The City received a grant of approximately $700,000 to construct trail connections. The local match of $300,000-$350,000 will be paid from fees paid by developers in lieu of land for parks. These fees can only be used for park projects-capital construction. City property taxes are not planned to be used for the trail construction project.
"Currently, it appears that an assessment will not be needed to correct the grade and install a trail (Mill Rd), part of the reason I favor doing it now. It is still being investigated to be certain."
Email sent by council member Tom Lee 9/7/2008

Quad Press 8/18/2008

Discussed trail grant priorities on which council members voted earlier. The cost of the 26 trails is expected to be more than 1.7 million, much of which will be covered by the transportation enhancement grant.
The numbers don't add up. Who is going to pay the additional $700,000? Why does a City of our size need 26 additional trails? Why can't the Citizens get a straight answer?

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Friday, September 26, 2008

OF, BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE

Here are the thoughts of another citizen that has issues with our current council.

In an article in the St. Paul Pioneer Press dated 9/21/08, Mayor Mary Capra is quoted as saying, "Residents leading the petition effort are doing so for personal reasons. Those backing the petition have either been directly or indirectly upset with an action of the City." Of course it is for personal reasons and because of actions of the City. Everything you do as an elected official affects our personal standard of living as a taxpayer of Centerville. This statement of yours drives wedges and mistrust. When citizens lose faith in local government, it is personal.
In 1776 our forefathers signed the Declaration of Independence and then in 1786 they ratified the constitution championing the rights of the individual and rejecting concepts like divine right of rule and aristocratic entitlement. A government of, by and for the people. The founding fathers knew the nations success depends upon the citizens being well informed so they made sure information could flow freely. The first Amendment protected and granted the right to peaceful assembly as well as free press. Our ancestors were in an unprecedented position to be able to exchange their ideas and opinions. This freedom assured that rule of reason prevailed. They trusted the people would make the right choice where it mattered most. In the voting booth. When freedom of speech falters and the market place of ideas fail it is almost impossible for us to fulfill the most essential civic obligation we have, making informed voter decisions to keep our government in check. Unfortunately there is no quicker path to voter disfranchising than being excluded from the process.
I have witnessed Centerville's government not listening, demeaning, and not respecting it's residents. When we ask questions, emails go unanswered or we get vague answers where we need to ask more questions. My wife was accused by Council member Lee of "causing all the animosity" at the May 1 public hearing. Call me crazy but I think the $20,000 assessments and the forcing of hooking up to water at an additional $7500 +/- had something to do with that, not my wife. Centerville is 7.8 million dollars in long term debt. You can minimize it all you want, it is still a substantial amount for a city of 3800. The need for a third party to get involved with a state audit is warranted when the citizens lose faith in their elected officials.
So, yes Mayor Capra you are right when you say residents heading the petition and those backing it are doing so for personal reasons because our founding fathers have afforded them the right to do so. I hope more people with personal reasons and citizens that have either been directly or indirectly affected by an action of the City, vote a new Mayor and two new council members into office. Everything you do at City Hall affects all of the citizens of Centerville. The list of the disfranchised is growing. We may not have been paying attention a few years ago but we are here now, so start listening to us. Don't walk on the rights our forefathers granted us.
Citizens of Centerville, please sign the state audit petition and make our local government accountable. It may cost us money but think of it as an investment in our future and the future of Centerville.

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Proposed Signs for City Entrance and City Hall

We really hate to harp on this but city officials leave us no choice! With a budget so tight they are struggling to put away $25,000 for road maintenance, (which still leaves us short) why is the city even considering spending our money this way?! Why replace the current City Hall sign and spend thousands of dollars for entrance signs that Anoka County provides for FREE?

Council minutes 8/27/2008
City Administrator Larson showed slides of a proposed sign design from Arrow Sign He stated that this will fit in the space where the current sign is in front of the City Hall It has also been proposed to have a message board below it He added that they could either use real brick or a plastic product that looks like brick City Administrator Larson stated that he had also received a proposal for Centerville entry sign
Mayor Capra inquired whether they could wait and look at this at the end of the year.
Council member BVickers stated that the total of the signs proposed would amount to over $70,000.
Council member Lee suggested that the City only do one of these signs per year. Council member BVickers suggested having Finance Director John Meyer come back with the impact of $40,000 for the sign and an additional $15,000 for an entry sign on the City budget. Council member Paar stated that the Council is already fighting the budget for the street maintenance He suggested that this may have to wait until there is extra money He stated that they could get the free sign from Anoka County for Centerville Road He added that the City should look at this when Highway 14 is completed and the building and developing are completed
Council member Lakso stated that she felt the most crucial sign would be the sign coming west on Highway 14 to welcome people into Centerville.
Discussion ensued
Council member Lee stated that he agreed with Council member Lakso. They would want the sign on Highway 14 to welcome people into town.

Sitting council is redecorating the City with OUR MONEY! They are spending a lot of time and effort on nonessential items, all the while, the road maintenance fund is being ignored!
We have already incurred a 8 million dollar debt under their watch!
Should new signs that cost thousands of dollars really be a priority?
Speak out from the voting booth on 11/04/2008!


Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Nasty Conduct, Nasty Email, Nasty Accusations!

9/25/2008
The city officials were having so much fun, exercising their first amendment right at last nights council meeting! They spent over 40 minutes bashing the citizens of Centerville and this blog. This happened after they discovered we are $35,000 over budget on the City's enhanced utility work and streepscaping. Was this due to poor planning? What other financial surprises are in store for the City?
We, the Citizens for Ethical Taxation and Representation are a very large group of concerned citizens who are watching for ethical, truthful behavior and accountability from our representatives. Whether spending our money or representing our community, their behavior last night was absolutely juvenile and wholly unacceptable!
Unfortunately, it has come to our attention that some members of council have received nasty, and profane emails from citizens in our community. We would like to go on the record, stating that NOTHING has been sent by us. (Except one message of thanks to council member Vickers regarding her stance on the road maintenance fund. She has not replied) We do not condone such behavior and resent the implication that we are somehow behind it. We challenge our city officials to show the emails they claim to have received from anyone associated with this blog.
Statements made to the press in recent times by staff and elected officials have been filled innuendo and half truths. We, the citizens will not give in to the the intimidation techniques used by council, staff or the city attorney! We also have first amendment rights!
All the whining from our council members reminds us of the New York Yankees that did not make it to the play-offs this year, for the first time since the mid nineties. There is one distinct difference between the Yankees and our council... The Yankees will definitely be back next year!
Go Twins!!!

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email: Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Audit Petition Volunteers Welcome

Due to the excitement surrounding the audit, we have discovered that walking the petition is time consuming . The citizens in our community want to talk! Many are thrilled to learn that they are not alone and warmly welcome our arrival. The blog has been contacted by residents asking where do we go, how we sign and when will someone stop by?
If you have time to volunteer or know someone that would be interested in obtaining signatures for the audit, please email us!

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Long Term Debt Discrepancies - Citizens Question

We here at Centerville Citizens For Ethical Taxation and Representation (CCFETR) have been fielding questions on what is the correct number for the long term debt of the City of Centerville. These questions have been originating from concerned citizens and media reporters.

Indeed, there HAS been THREE different numbers stated in the reporting on this blog, handouts, and the Pioneer Press article. It is not our job at CCFETR to try to make sense of these discrepancy but to bring it to the community's attention. We also want the community to know that if you have felt as though the city has you chasing your tail, you are not alone.

Here is a break down with dates to highlight the discrepancies.

Email from Finance Director John Meyer on August 13:
$8,055,896
This number was used on the blog in August.

Annual Financial Report dated Dec 31, 2007
$9,175,675
This number was used on the handout that was passed out at the neighborhood meeting and also passed out from door to door. We also included 2005 and 2006 long term debt figures out of the annual financial reports in the corresponding years.

The Pioneer Press reported in last Sunday's newspaper
"Debt. at the end of 2008, the city will have more than $7.8 million."


Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

The Petition and The Press

The Quad Press
"Capra also said she is putting together a breakdown of tax levies over the last 20 years for county, school and city to inform citizens of what they have had to pay."
Link Here
We wait with bated breath! Will the information be available before election day?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Centerville Trivia ~ Sidewalk Ordinance/2006

Who is responsible for the maintenance/repair of Centerville sidewalks?
A: The City
B: Property Owners
The answer may surprise you
!

Sidewalk, Right-Of-Way Ordinance Changes
The council also unanimously approved two local ordinance amendments intended to specify that property owners - and not City Hall - are responsible for maintaining sidewalks and adjoining rights-of-way near their residences.
The city's existing ordinances are "not real clear as to the maintenance of sidewalks or the maintenance of green space . that that's what these [amendments] are intended to do - clear that up," City Administrator Dallas Larson explained shortly before the council's vote.
Several council members questioned whether property owners should be liable for cracked or broken sidewalks directly outside their homes, for example, with Council Member Tom Lee commenting that at first blush, "that seems like it's not quite fair." However, Larson explained that "it is common" in Minnesota to shift sidewalk and right-of-way maintenance liability "away from the city."

"Many, many cities do it this way. In fact, I'm sure I could safely say that most cities do it this way," Larson said. He also compared property-owner liability under the amendments to that when snowplows disrupt sodding on sidewalk medians. "
It's the property owner's responsibility to replace that, too," Larson said.

After a brief discussion, Lee, too, was convinced about the wisdom of the new sidewalk and right-of-way amendments. "I think this is the right thing to do, even though I'm not too crazy about it," Lee said. "I think this is the right thing to do for the city, anyway."
*The Citizen

Council Minutes 10/11/2006
Amending Chapter 93 of the Centerville Code by Amending Section 9301 Relating to Maintenance of Sidewalks
City Administrator Larson explained that the existing Ordinances were not real clear on maintenance of sidewalks and this is an attempt to make it clear that adjoining property owners are responsible Council Member Lee indicated that he did not realize that residents were responsible for repairs of sidewalks. City Administrator Larson explained that this is typical language of most cities Motion by Council Member Lakso seconded by Council Member Terway to approve Ordinance Second Series Amending Chapter 93 of the Centerville Code by Amending Section 9301 Relating to Maintenance of Sidewalks All in favor, Motion carried unanimously

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Monday, September 22, 2008

Planning and Zoning Commission.

The Planning and Zoning Commission Currently Has an Opening.
The commission meets the first Tuesday of each month at City Hall. Please consider serving your community by becoming a member. Application available Here.
FYI; Tom Wood and Ben Fehrenbacher both currently on Planning and Zoning are running for City Council.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Centerville Residents Challenge City's Spending










Why did the City purchase a new public works building (left) for the sum of 1.4 million dollars while the current building (right) appears sufficient?

UPDATE!
At its July 11, 2007 meeting, the Centerville City Council officially approved the purchase of the old Centerville Redi-Mix site as the city's new Public Works Department base.
The city will pay $1.4 million for the property, with $800,000 of the initial funds coming from the general fund, $400,000 coming from the sewer fund, and another $200,000 coming from the water fund.
The city is planning to receive approximately $400,000 for the sale of the current public works property, although no time frame has yet been established for that sale.
As of today the building sits... UNSOLD!
*The Citizen

Group gathering signatures to petition state for an audit
By Brady Gervais
bgervais@pioneerpress.com
A group of Centerville residents concerned that city officials are on an unnecessary spending spree want the state to audit their city.

There were some rather interesting quotes in the article. Some of the printed story has been omitted online.
"You can say we shouldn't have that much debt," Larson (City Administrator) said. But it is not improper. It was just a decision that was made and a debt that was incurred."


Residents leading the petition effort are doing so for personal reasons, Capra (Mayor) said. Those backing the petition have "either been directly or indirectly upset with an action of the city," she said.

Why was it a necessary "decision" to incur this debt, Mr. Larson? Exactly what was the justification?
Why does the Mayor make her statement? Hasn't every resident been affected directly or indirectly by the actions of the City? Further questioning may be in order.

dlarson@centervillemn.com Dallas Larson
capria@comcast.net Mary Capra

Please read the printed copy for full story.
Partial Story Here

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Media Coverage in the Pioneer Press

In this Sunday Pioneer Press newspaper, Centerville Citizens for Ethical Taxation is expecting an article written about our Petition for a State Audit. Please check it out!
Stay tuned here for media coverage on the citizens push for change!

Centerville Has a Dedicated Road Maintenance Fund?

City Council passed the preliminary 2009 road budget during the September 10th meeting.
A whopping $25,000 will be set aside for street reconstruction and reserve. We know that the City needs $60,000 just to cover the seal coating projects scheduled for next year. This still leaves us short $35,000 but hey, it's a start.
Thank you to all the citizens that have been so involved. Together, we might be able to get the fund increased to the $100,000 Council Member Broussard-Vickers stated we need.

How about slashing part of the $84,000 budgeted funds the City spends on Park Programs and Maintenance for the SIX parks we have in a 2.2 square mile radius?

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

What Results Can We Expect From a State Audit?

We can not say with any certainty what a State audit will reveal. The reason we are requesting one is to determine if our City is being managed properly. Citizens want to address the debt and understand why it has increased over a million dollars for each of the past two years. The audit will also address spending. Why did Council spend $517,000 for unnecessary streetscaping which caused an additional bill of over $54,000 for engineering and administrative costs? Why do we now own a second public works building at the cost of 1.4 million dollars? Are the people behind the walls of City Hall managing the City correctly and being good stewards of our money? The audit will answer these questions!
The City will be billed hourly by the state. Hugo is expecting a price tag of under $20,000. If Centerville spends this much but the audit reveals how to save $50,000, isn't it worth it?
The following links detail the results of a State audit completed for each city. In reviewing the audits you also get an understanding how each city is managed.

Cambridge
Crosby
Bena
Kenyon
Phillips
Ronneby
Harris
Albany
Stacy

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

State Audit Meeting a Success!

Thank you to all the residents that turned out last night! The room was almost unbearably warm but the crowd of 85 stayed for the entire meeting.


In fact, many people remained far after the meeting ended and visited with their neighbors. New friendships were made and new alliances were born. There was a sense of community that has not been felt in a long time. The very reason many of us moved to Centerville was reaffirmed last night!
The concern expressed for our city was overwhelming. There are many intelligent citizens in this city and many informed questions were asked. Although we are just beginning our journey, the first steps were taken last night, by many residents.

Citizens had the opportunity to meet four of the candidates last night. First we heard from Stephanie Blomseth, running for council. Next was Ben Fehrenbacher also running for city council. Council candidate Neale Rawlings attended the meeting and left early with his adorable 18 month old twin boys. His platform was left for the residents to review. The two candidates running against our incumbent Mayor spoke; Bryce Wasiloski and Laura Powers. These candidates are going to give Mary a run for her money! It should be an exciting election!

When the meeting ended, many citizens volunteered to walk the petition and took the needed excess spending fact sheet. Unfortunately, we are unaware of which areas will be walked and hope they will follow up with us here.

We need to obtain the signatures of 423 registered voters before we send the petition to Anoka County for certification. As we move forward, we will keep a running total of the number of signatures we have and keep you updated on how many more we need to comply with the state audit laws.

This is an exciting time for the citizens of Centerville. We have the opportunity to change our local government and make it work for us, as intended! Thank to everyone who participated last night to what WILL BE a great start to reform!

Government of the people, by the people and for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Gettysburg Address ~ Abraham Lincoln



Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Small-town charm eludes suburbs' attempts to build it

CLICK IMAGE TO READ CENTERVILLE'S APPROVED MASTER PLAN & DEVELOPMENT GUIDE.
A great Article from the Pioneer Press that speaks directly to Centerville!! We can stop this before we get to the empty storefronts!
Some interesting quotes from the article;
"They put their own judgment ahead of the private sector. The Heart of the City is an absolute disaster," said Gene Happe, a developer who has built 45 commercial buildings in Burnsville.
"Everyone in Heart of the City is near bankruptcy," Happe said, rattling off names of condo builders and businesses. "My advice to anyone else about small-town charm is: Don't touch it."

Grand projects can leave only controversy and empty storefronts.


Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Monday, September 15, 2008

Have City Officials Bitten Off More Than They Can Chew?

One story of the many citizens here in Centerville that were going to have property seized under eminent domain... That is before the Governor changed the law in 2006. Here is a letter to the current Mayor.

Mayor Mary Capra
1810 Fox Run, Centerville MN 55038
Dear Mayor Capra:
April 28, 2008
We feel privileged to be part of a smaller town/community. Typically a small town affords City government more personal contact with it’s citizens. We feel that is true for Centerville - a town we have truly loved for many years. Thus, we felt that writing to you personally would be appropriate and welcomed.
First, we understand that Centerville City Council has been facing and will continue to face challenging decisions over this next year. We wanted to express some of our concerns regarding those decisions. In specific, how the Council’s decisions have affected us.
This is our personal story in a nutshell:
We built our home on Centerville Lake at 1580 Sorel Street (several doors down from St. Genevieve Church) in 1994 and moved in May 7th, 1995. We were excited when LyNae’s parents (Lloyd & Diane Hansen) built next door to us (1588 Sorel) one and a half years later. Our intention was to look after them as they grew older and that by living next door, we could most adequately do this.
We began our own electrical company the summer of 2002. We are a small company and desire to remain small (2 employees). From the onset, our personal 3-car garage posed ‘space problems’ for all our electrical materials, along with our boats, trailers, etc. We had been looking for property close to home for storage and as an investment. We had talked with the owner of 1688 Sorel Str (across street from front doors of St. Genevieve Church and only ½ block from our home). We bought the property 2004, which at the time was zoned R-2, with the intentions of tearing down all the existing buildings and putting up two new homes (for rental and overflow). We also had every intention of following all and any guidelines set up by Centerville regarding covenants, etc. Then the Council changed the zoning ordinance from R-2 to "Mixed Use", which then led to the Council setting up the moratorium, then another rezoning and well, you know the rest. Originally, we never wanted to sell our investment property to the City. But when the City stated ultimately they would implement Eminent Domain against us (at the Beard & neighbors meeting), we felt we had no choice. The effort, stress and risk it took for us to purchase an investment property only to have the Council tie our hands and eventually relinquish it all to the City has been egregious.
In addition, the Council was making plans to put in high density housing and shops only ½ block away from our residence for the purpose of bringing in more businesses & residents, thus creating more tax revenue for the City. By this time, our small-town-"warm-fuzzies" were fading fast.
We did not want to live next to high density housing and shops, although we have always been advocates in "cleaning up" the downtown area. We believe however, that the ends do not justify the means in this case: entice developers by taking taxes and giving it to the developers (Beard) for the next 20 years. In our opinion, this "corporate welfare", along with the taking of one’s property by government (Eminent Domain), is unconscionable.
So, feeling quite hopeless, we sold everything in 2007. More importantly, we left our hopes and dreams: moving out of our dream home and away from Mom & Dad and selling our investment property (1688 Sorel) to the City.
We have moved to a home we bought in 2003: 7216 LaValle Drive, Centerville, across the lake from our Sorel home we sold. To be sure, this much older home does not have the same appeal to us as our 1580 Sorel home that we ourselves built from the ground up. Nonetheless, we feel fortunate to continue to be on the lake and in Centerville. That is, until recently.
Now we are facing another Centerville ‘taking’ in this home! The Council is considering turning our 1 block, dead end private road (LaValle Drive) into a public street, which we understand would quite possibly mean that the City of Centerville would once again take part of our personal property. The Council has stated they will not force hook up to City water, yet if we decide to move, it would be required to hook up before we could sell, and all of this at a cost of around $14,000-$20,000.
We enjoy our well water and believe it to be superior in every way, including safety and taste. It is one of the reasons we chose our property on Sorel and why we purchased our current home. We are not interested in being forced to hook up and drink chemically treated public water when our natural pure well water suffices. We are not interested in relinquishing our private street, hooking up to City water or capping our well. Certainly, those of us currently with wells should be allowed to keep them indefinitely, especially those of us on a private road! There is no good enough reason, at least to us, that the City of Centerville should take our private road and property.
Mayor Capra, in truth, we just want to be left alone. Please reconsider this forcible hook up and taking property that ethically is not the City’s to take. This is more than a personal issue for us, it’s a moral one. We believe Centerville Council would be overstepping, once again, the bounds in which government was originally intended.
Finally, we are firm believers that, for the most part, those that serve the citizens do so with good and right intentions and bear an enormous responsibility coupled with much work. Indeed, we believe this is true for the Centerville Council. And so, that is why we often pray for all our leaders that govern us, both locally and nationally. We are grateful for your service and time.
Sincerely,
Erick & LyNae
7216 LaValle Drive, Centerville MN 55038
cc: Centerville City Council, P & Z

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Increasing Taxes During an Economic Downturn is Suicide

Anoka County among hardest hit in housing crisis
The county's foreclosure rate was among the fastest growing in the metro region, and the prevention hot line is on the front lines.
By PAUL LEVY, Star Tribune
Anoka County has the highest rate of foreclosures in the metro area, according to 2007 statistics, with calls to a county foreclosure-prevention hot line having quadrupled in recent months.
"It's explosive, unbelievable, like a train wreck with people who have overextended themselves crashing against changing interest rates," said Jan Backlin, director of home ownership programs at Anoka County Community Action Program (ACCAP), which runs the hot line.
Full Story Here
Centerville Foreclosures
2005 ~7
2006 ~16
2007 ~21
2008 ~14 (Aug. 31)

Anoka County
2005 ~520
2006 ~849
2007 ~1,680
2008 ~1,622 and counting...
*Statistics From the Anoka County Community Development Dept
Current 9/15/2008

Minnesota Foreclosure Data
HousingLink is an independent, nonpartisan, Twin Cities-based organization that specializes in the collection and distribution of affordable housing information. HousingLink's data and information is utilized by various stakeholder groups including direct service providers, housing providers and policymakers within our service area. Because of the vast impact of the recent foreclosure crisis, HousingLink has undertaken several foreclosure data collection efforts through partnerships with other local organizations. These reports are located HERE

The Twin Cities Metro has a projected foreclosure rate of 19,936 in 2008 compared to 3,759 in 2005.
State Wide the foreclosure numbers are 28,282 for 2008 compared to 6,466 in 2005.
How many citizens will be forced out of their homes here in Centerville, due to the increased tax burden? Do the people making financial decisions for our city even care? Bring power back to the people with your vote on election day!
*2008 Foreclosures (Projected) numbers are based on first quarter 2008 actual foreclosure counts

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Friday, September 12, 2008

Protect the Citizens of Centerville

Gov. Pawlenty said in his speech on March 9, 2006

"One of the most important roles of government is to protect its citizens. Sometimes that means protecting them from their own government. I urge us to come together to pass meaningful and responsible reforms to Minnesota's eminent domain laws." The new eminent domain laws went into effect on May 20, 2006.

Citizens of Centerville, please hear this! The actions by the Centerville government is a horrific example of the Governor's statement!

Below is an excerpt from the Development Agreement dated July 11, 2007 (an entire year after the new laws were set into place):

"WHEREAS among the major objectives of the City in establishing the Project are to eradicate blight and blighting conditions existing within the City to enhance the tax base of the City to provide decent safe and sanitary housing opportunities for the residents of the City to promote and secure the prompt commercial development of certain real property located in the Project Area which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact on the environment and to promote and create additional employment opportunities within the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area thereby improving living standards and reducing unemployment;"

The Development Agreement also reads:
"WHEREAS the City is willing to work with the Developer under the terms provided in this Agreement to acquire properties in the Project Area in order to assist in the redevelopment effort;"

Supreme Court Justice O'Conner made this statement about the Kelo ruling:
"Under the banner of economic development, all private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded--i.e., given to an owner who will use it in a way that the legislature deems more beneficial to the public--in the process."

Citizens of Centerville! Do we want the Government of Centerville to be our developer? This is not the standard role for Cities. Developers normally acquire homes and then bring their plans to the City Council to be approved. In Centerville's plan, the City has designed the development and singled out one developer for the entire project. The development project is relying heavily on the increase tax base which in-turn will remove residents from their homes, to be replaced with bigger better multi-family homes.

Minnesota (S.F. 2750) Signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19, 2006 prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development; requiring eminent domain to be used only for a public use or public purpose; requiring condemning authorities to show clear and convincing evidence for certain takings; providing for condemnation for blight mitigation under certain conditions; specifying public hearing requirements; expanding certain petition notice requirements; requiring compensation for removal of legal nonconforming use; specifying certain minimum compensation requirements; providing for the awarding of attorney fees; providing for a right of first refusal; specifying certain notice requirements; and, providing for certain court orders finding the taking necessary.
S.F. 2750 Link Here

We urge everyone to attend the neighborhood meeting on September 16 to help give the power BACK TO THE PEOPLE!

COPYRIGHT 2006 Saint Paul Pioneer Press
Byline: Bill Salisbury May 16, 2006
Minnesotans soon won't have to worry about government seizing their property to make room for an office park or shopping center. The Minnesota Senate and House on Monday passed a bill to rein in the use of eminent domain -- the power of government to condemn private property -- so cities and counties no longer can take homes and businesses to make way for larger tax-generating commercial developments.States are strengthening private property rights after the U.S. Supreme Court last year ruled that the city of New London, Conn., could seize and tear down private homes to make way for a hotel and office buildings. But the court also declared states could restrict such takings. Minnesota lawmakers seized that opportunity.They passed a bill that "will make it very, very difficult for the government to take someone's private property," said its chief Senate sponsor, Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook. Bakk said the measure restores citizens' Fifth Amendment right to own property and be protected from government taking it "unless there is a public use and just compensation." The legislation will bar a city from taking property from one private owner and giving it to another, he said, "just because a city planner might have a different vision of what a corner or a neighborhood should look like." The bill would allow local governments to seize private homes or businesses for economic redevelopment only if the properties are severely blighted, environmentally contaminated, abandoned or a clear public nuisance.

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Friday, September 5, 2008

Save Centerville State Audit Meeting 9/16/2008

Attention Centerville Citizens!
Update
It has been brought to our attention that have been confused regarding the City debt. We have attempted to get the accurate information from our officials. Dallas Larson stated that special assessments do not count against the state mandated limit, even though it's still debt. The only thing we know for certain today is that
"The City of Centerville has $8,055,896 in long term debt."
John Meyer
Finance Director
Date: August 13, 2008

Do you wonder why we needed multi-colored cross-walks, 20 lamp posts over a two block area while our City debt is over 8 million dollars?

Has your property been threatened by eminent domain even though it is against MN state law?
Are you being bullied by city officials for a new trail system, power lines, land, or increased taxes without appropriate representation?
Has your real estate taxes sky rocketed for absolutely no reason, or because of special assessments?
Are you frustrated by other actions (or lack of action) by our city officials?

If you said “YES!” to any of these statements, please join the Neighborhood meeting that represents CHANGE!

WHERE: Bobby and Steve’s Conference Room
WHEN: September 16, 6:30 pm

AGENDA:
How a state audit petition works and what we need to be successful.
Information on complaints currently filed against the City of Centerville
Information on the Mayor and City Council race.
Volunteer sign-up to help bring the state audit petition to the citizens of Centerville


Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Eminent Domain as Last Resort? Negotiations Halted.

Dear Editor,

In response to the article in the October 9, 2007, Quad Community Press titled “Eminent domain concerns may be unfounded”, we question the word “may” because we know, and the city knows, these concerns also may be very real. Reading the proposal’s fine print, it states if voluntary agreements are not reached the City will initiate eminent domain. Then the City can deem the property blighted or obsolete and the property in question can be taken involuntarily.
While the City Council and the Beard Group may not have a concrete plan, we do know which homes will be affected; all of the downtown Centerville area. We are losing our small, hometown neighborhood to multifamily, high-density, three story buildings, duplicates of which we are seeing unoccupied and being foreclosed upon everywhere in the metro area and beyond.

Our family has been through this all before. Our beautiful home and farm on George Watch Lake was taken forcefully from us by eminent domain thirty years ago. We were compensated according to an Anoka County appraiser’s recommendations and were helpless to receive what the land was really worth.

Margaret has lived in this neighborhood for all of her 86 years, except for the 3½ years she spent in the Air Force, and she hates what this development will do to the little city that she has lived in and loved for so long. This development plan will destroy one of the oldest little communities in Minnesota and changing it into just another nightmare of row upon row of multifamily, non-interactive housing.

At this stage in our lives, we had not planned on being uprooted and sent off to find another place to live, like old kitchen appliances that no longer fit in the modern kitchen. It may be called progress, but we call it heartless.

Leo and Margaret Hensel
Centerville Citizens

Since this was published in the Quad Press, Leo has passed away. Our condolences to Margaret and her family.

Centerville Property Owners Concerned About Eminent Domain
City Says Seizures Possible, But Not Preferred Course
By Aaron Rupar
CENTERVILLE - Just months aft er the question of whether the city of Hugo would use eminent domain to acquire downtown properties became a source of friction between the city and concerned property owners, residents and business owners in Centerville are dealing with similar anxieties as the Beard Group begins its quest to acquire downtown properties included in phase one of the city's downtown redevelopment plan.
The city held an open house to inform residents about the downtown redevelopment plan on September 6, and many downtown property owners in attendance expressed concern about the possibility of being forced to sell their land.
Summarizing the mood of the evening, Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers said that "the overall air was not positive."
"There was a lot of distrust [from downtown property owners] towards the city and Beard," she said.
One of the people in attendance at the open house was attorney Lisa Dahlquist, attorney at Larkin Hoffman. Dahlquist said she'll be representing some of the downtown property owners as the Beard Group attempts to purchase their land.
"[The Beard Group] has been attempting to negotiate a direct purchase from willing sellers, but there are willing sellers who feel that the amount of money they are being offered isn't fair-market value," Dahlquist said in a later interview. Dahlquist said that some owners are fearful that if they can't reach a purchase agreement with Beard, the city will use eminent domain to seize properties against the will of the owners.
Recent changes in state statute dictate the limited circumstances under which cities can acquire properties through eminent domain. According to City Administrator Dallas Larson, the city would only be able to seize properties in the redevelopment area that are slated to be converted to public uses, such as roads or parking lots.
Larson acknowledges that eminent domain is a possibility, but he said that the city's hope is that any sort of land seizure can be avoided.
"No decisions have been made. [Eminent domain] is possible in some cases but it's the city's hope that we won't have to go down that route, and we'll have negotiated sales," he said.
Ron Mehl of the Beard Group also said that the company hopes eminent domain can be avoided.
"We would never want to force anyone out of their home; we're in the business of developing property," said Mehl, who added that any decisions about whether to pursue eminent domain will ultimately be the prerogative of the city.
One of the people Dahlquist will be representing is downtown property owner Margaret Lee, who has held neighborhood meetings with other area property owners at her home.
Lee said that she doesn't know of any downtown property owners who aren't willing to work with the city, but she's frustrated by the fact that the rezoning of downtown has precluded her from adding-on to her home.
"Almost everybody I've spoken to, including me, were willing to sell our houses," she said. "What's frustrating is that we don't have a right to live in our house the way we want to [right now] because they've written it into the zoning code . they've basically taken our property for their redevelopment plan."
While the redevelopment project is undoubtedly causing hardship for some residents, City Administrator Larson pointed out that there are other property owners in the area that are eager to sell. Additionally, he said that he believes the public remains supportive of the city's larger goal of revitalizing downtown.
Mehl said that the Beard Group would be sending out "letters of intent" to all property owners within the phase one area before the end of October. These letters will outline the terms of sale that the Beard Group would be amenable to.
If the process proceeds in accordance with the Beard Group's plan, those non-binding letters will be turned into binding purchase agreements, setting the stage for construction to begin with next spring's thaw.
However, Council Member Broussard Vickers said that it was her impression that some property owners will be unwilling to sell regardless of the terms. "Some will not go quietly into the night, that's for sure," she said.
The first phase of the downtown redevelopment plan involves clearing and demolition of properties adjacent to Centerville Road and Main Street and the subsequent reconstruction of commercial and residential buildings, and a similar overhaul for some downtown properties east of Progress Road.
The Beard Group's long-term plan for phase one includes the construction of 14,000 square feet of retail/office space and a 41-unit apartment building.
Mehl said that the Beard Group intends to make fair offers to the downtown property owners.
"We want to be good neighbors," he said, adding that if the company is unable to acquire properties within phase one the overall redevelopment plan would have to be modified.
While acknowledging the increasing anxiety level of downtown land owners, Council Member Broussard Vickers said that she believes the Beard Group will deal fairly while trying to acquire properties within phase one.
"[The city] feels that [Beard] will be an above-board developer and will make fair offers," she said.
As of November negotiations have halted. The residents are not allowed to make any type of improvement to their existing property. The area has been zoned "mixed use" which makes any sale nearly impossible, without a developer. Why are these citizens being held hostage, while Beard has been allowed to step back? Given the current economic state, it may be time for Council to reassess the scope of the project, yet again!

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email
Centervilleblog@yahoo.com

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Where Has Professionalism and Accountability Gone?

Why do the City Administrator, Finance Director and Public Works Director have City email accounts, yet the Mayor and Council members do not? Could it be a matter of not wanting to answer questions or be held accountable for their actions? Numerous emails have remained ignored and/or not responded to by our elected officials. When prompted by a citizen, here is what the Mayor had to say regarding their lack of any timely, professional or responsible response;

From: Dan and Mary Capra
Date: 8/22/2008 3:40 P.M.
Dear XXXX,
Regarding email I have staff looking into the cost of adding city email addresses for all council members with an automatic response. We all have our home email addresses listed on the website and I know several of the council members have had problems with their home email, servers and computers (myself included). If this change takes place you will see it on the website.

Sincerely,
Mary Capra

This is not rocket science. If you are having a problem, fix it! The answer should not be "If this change takes place you will see it on the website". It should be, When this change takes place. Whoever manages the website can set up email addresses for everyone in about three minutes. There is no additional charge for this service and no reason to spend money “looking into it”. In fact, the citizen offered to set up the professional email accounts (with auto responders) for free. This response smells like an excuse to anyone that has ever managed a website or tried to get a response from our elected officials.
Election is just around the corner. The Mayor is up for reelection as are two council seats this November. Remember, we deserve the government we elect!

Contact us privately with City information, news and personal stories. All contact information will be kept private and not posted on the blog unless requested.
Email Centervilleblog@yahoo.com