One Resident Questions Why

Her property was assessed $90,000 while the street in front of her driveway was dropped approximately 5 ft due to the Clear Water Creek Development.
Centerville City officials are on record stating the assessment payments would not have to be paid until the driveway was fully corrected. Payments came due last December, ironically the same time this homeowner was hit by a following vehicle while entering the unsafe drive. Prior to the Clear Water Creek Development start this driveway was level with the street and there were no safety issues.
The real question may be who is responsible for repairing the collapsed drive? The City of Centerville or the Developer?

A Little History Review
Per The Citizen July 10, 2008
Fruth had appeared before Centerville City Council at a previous meeting, at which she claimed her drive had been left four feet above street level since the road improvements had been made.
She was offered two options to remedy the situation by the city engineer at the July 10 meeting, but explained she would need further time to decide which course of action she wished to pursue. The City Council voted to delay the passing of a resolution on Old Mill Road residents’ special assessments until a later meeting when Fruth’s situation had been resolved.
The Citizen

Ms. Fruth questions why the City of Centerville is insisting her property is potentially worth over one million dollars while the Anoka County property tax statement shows her property value has dropped approximately $50,000 and Zillow.com estimates a value of $272,500. Ms. Fruth is willing to sell to any developer willing to pay the price (One Million) the current council claims the property is worth.
Why do Council members continue to insist they know everything? We see every day how their pretending to be decorators influenced the colored concrete and street lights on Main Street!

As you can see the driveway issue has still not been resolved by the City of Centerville yet the resident has already been assessed $90,000. Curiously, the Developer (previous member of Planning and Zoning history) has had his assessments deferred.
Additional history Here

Is Potential Use of Land a Reason to Get the Shaft?

It appears that two residences on Old Mill Road have not ended their court dispute with the City of Centerville regarding their $90,000 special assessments. Currently, they are awaiting a hearing in Anoka County scheduled the afternoon of August 24th.
A little history;
May 23, 2007
"In a letter addressed to the city, the Fruths wrote, "that proposal put forth by Jeff and Laura Hanzel [sic] is solely for their financial benefit and does not, in any way, serve to benefit us, our property, or the City . It is our intention to exercise each and every legal right available to us to prevent this ridiculous cost to ourselves." A nearly identical letter was sent to the city by Fred Fischer, who also opposes the project.
At the public hearing, Peter Fruth told council and staff that "we cannot afford a $100,000 assessment. After Peter spoke, Cathy, visibly upset, told council and staff that "we're not gaining a thing . We are being pressured to pay for something for [Hanzals'] development which I don't think we should have to pay for."
Although the Fruths' and Fishers' properties are currently zoned as Rural Residential, which stipulates a density of one lot per ten acres, staff pointed out that it is almost guaranteed that the zoning will change as the city moves through its Comprehensive Plan revision process this year and next, allowing them to subdivide.
"I've got no beef with Jeff Hanzal," Fisher said, "but my problem is that he wants to make money and he's doing it on my back. "He's the one selling the lots; let him pay for the road," he added. After the public hearing was closed, the council passed a resolution ordering the Old Mill Road improvements to go forward.
Prior to that vote, Council Member Lee, turning to look Peter and Cathy Fruth in the eyes, said "As much as it pains me to see old time residents feel like they have to move, this project was going to happen in a year anyway, and be more expensive."
"[However], if I were in your shoes, I'd feel like I was getting the shaft, too," he added.
Council Member Tom Lee argued that the size of the Fruths' property was part of the reason their assessment was so high. "Because your property has the potential to be many lots, the assessment is what it is," he said.
The Citizen

July 10, 2008
Only one person spoke at the hearing, Jeff Carroll, a lawyer representing Old Mill Road neighbors Cathy Fruth and Fred Fischer, but he said both his clients were very dissatisfied with the bills they had been sent.
He questioned the assessments, which he said indicated the property values would increase by $100,000 apiece, from a current estimated value of $375,000.
“The current taxes are over $5,000,” said Carroll. “This is going to increase their taxes to $14,000 a year, an increase of 140 percent, which is incredibly substantial.”
Fruth had appeared before Centerville City Council at a previous meeting, at which she claimed her drive had been left four feet above street level since the road improvements had been made.
She was offered two options to remedy the situation by the city engineer at the July 10 meeting, but explained she would need further time to decide which course of action she wished to pursue.
The City Council voted to delay the passing of a resolution on Old Mill Road residents’ special assessments until a later meeting when Fruth’s situation had been resolved.
The Citizen

The Fruth and Fisher families are considering taking their case all the way to the Minnesota Supreme Court if unsuccessful in Anoka County. Ms. Fruth questions why the City of Centerville is insisting her property is potentially worth over one million dollars while the Anoka County property tax statement shows her property value has dropped approximately $50,000 since this all started two years ago. Ms. Fruth also is willing to sell to any developer willing to pay the price the current council claims the property is worth.
Update:
As of today, the driveway situation has not been resolved between Ms. Fruth and the City of Centerville and both properties are still zoned Rural Residential (one lot per ten acres)

City Council Meeting 6/10/2009

Should the opinion of a "professional" (City obtained) Appraiser trump the findings of the Anoka County Assessor? Apparently, here in Centerville it does so by a unanimous City Council vote! The business was assessed more than the entire worth of the property!
June 10, 2009 City Council minutes taken directly from the Centerville City website.

City Attorney Glaser stated that he had reviewed all the numbers with City Engineer Statz and City Administrator Larson and conducted due diligence He had also hired a professional appraiser He stated there was one exception a previous assessment to the property in approximately 1990. At that time the entire parcel was owned by Sheehy and fourths to they sold three Lloyd Drilling Later the City purchased the Lloyd Drillings portion The total assessment was $82,000 He suggested that the Council be conservative and credit fourth or 500 which was paid on the old Sheehy approximately one $20,000 assessment This would make Sheehys assessment approximately $380,000.

Patrick Lee OHalloran, Sheehys attorney stated that Sheehy objection is two fold.

1. According to the Minnesota Supreme Court and the statutes all you can assess is an increase in the property value from the improvements. $316,000 is the entire property value according to the County Assessor

2 All benefiting properties should be assessed In this case no other property owners who benefited have been assessed

MrLee O Halloran stated that when Sheehy owned the entire parcel they were assessed and paid for the assessment Therefore they already paid for the same improvements and do not have to pay for them twice He continued that the east side of property borders Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes benefited as much as Sheehy The total amount received from Lino Lakes was $150,000 for the same amount of frontage. Mr Lee OHalloran stated that only a small section of their property needed improvement Sheehy would like Centerville to consider $154,000 the real offer for the as assessment, they believe is more than fair.

Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 21St Avenue Backage Road Improvements
Council member Lee stated that he is in agreement with the City Staff about the expected increase in value Council member Fehrenbacher stated that he agrees with staff recommendation on the $400,000 number City Attorney Glaser stated that when a party appeals an assessment to the District Court the Court does not decide what the number will be If it believes the City number is wrong it will be sent back to the City He noted that litigation could cost approximately $20,000 Councilmember Broussard Vickers stated that she supports the findings of the appraiser, City Administrator Larson, City Engineer Statz and City Attorney Glaser. Mayor Capra stated that she disagrees with the $154,000 number proposed by Sheehy She stated that she would agree to decrease the proposed assessment amount by the $20,500 credit for the earlier assessment
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers seconded by Council Member Paar to approve Res Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 21 St Avenue Backage Road Improvements setting the Sheehy assessment at $379,000. All in favor Motion carried unanimously.
Link Quad Press Story Here